Submissions

Author Guidelines

Papers are welcome from authors around the globe, thus authors are asked to make sure that their papers provide enough background information so that readers of all backgrounds may appreciate their contributions.

The various paper types

The following categories of papers may be taken into consideration for inclusion:

1. Research originality;
2. Brief communications, as well as
3. Review articles, such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews

Please feel free to download the template in LATEX or MS Word format. Use the authors' manual as a template and guidance for writing your papers.

• Additionally, manuscripts should be spellchecked using the feature offered by the majority of reputable word processing programs.
• It is best to refrain from overusing italics and bolding inside the text.
• Papers shouldn't typically be more than 5,000 words and should be concise, precise, and logical.
• The Abstract should clearly identify the problem, the suggested strategy or solution, and highlight the most important findings and conclusions. It should be informative and entirely self-explanatory. The Abstract ought to be between 150 and 200 words long. The past tense should be used to write the abstract.
• In addition to the keywords that are already included in the title, the keyword list offers the chance to add additional keywords that are used by the indexing and abstracting services. Using keywords wisely may make it easier for interested individuals to find our material.
• The Background, Problem Statement, Literature Review, Proposed Approach or Solution, and New Value of Research (which is Innovation) should all be clearly stated in the Introduction. It need to be comprehensible to coworkers from a variety of scientific fields.
• Describing the study process in chronological order, including the research design. In order for the explanation to be recognized scientifically, the description of the research course should be accompanied with references.
• Tables and figures are positioned in the middle.
• The results should be described and a thorough discussion should be included in the results and discussion section.
• A strong conclusion should include a claim that the "Results and Discussion" section is compatible with the expectations set in the "Introduction" section. Additionally, the potential of the development of study findings and the application of future studies (based on the findings and debate) might be added.
• Each citation should be enclosed in square brackets and listed in the text in the order that it appears. For instance, the first, second, third, and fourth citations [1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively]. The preferred practice is to list each source individually when citing several at once. In-text citation illustrations:
  
  • The treatment proved highly effective [1]."
  • Smith [5] states that the treatment was ...
  • Several recent studies [4], [6], [11-15] have suggested that....
  • ...to educate the citizens and citizen-leaders for our society [16].